Added 17/4/2011 You are here: Jubilee River Home Page > Jubilee River - key facts > What's wrong with the Jubilee River? > Jubilee River story > How to contact me > Jubilee River guided tours
< PREVIOUS PAGE NEXT PAGE > INDEX > ARCHIVE INDEX >
The Jubilee River story - What's wrong with the Jubilee River? (and the Environment Agency)
'£110,000,000 of your money and no accountability.'
“We know the Jubilee River works, there is no question about it. Nonetheless, the Atkins reviews do raise important concerns that the Environment Agency is addressing with urgency.” (Chris Birks - EA Thames region director - August 2004)
In brief:
The Environment Agency spent £110m of public money on this flood alleviation scheme between 1996 and 2003.
A flawed concept, sub-standard design and construction, and mis-operation led to hundreds of homes downstream of Windsor flooding for the first time in over fifty years, a £5m repair bill and a £2.75m out-of-court settlement with the designers.
In January 2003 (at only 2/3rds capacity) almost every structure and embankment sustained damage.
The Jubilee River is still unable to carry its design capacity, and the Myrke embankment is still incorrect and degrading, and nobody is accountable!
And in Sept 2009 the EA announced a £300m scheme to build three new channels > LTFRMS Consultation
Seven years since Thames 2003 flood event, and still no honesty from the Environment Agency
Jubilee River - flawed design and sub-standard construction cost £110m (Jan 2007 - Closure report)
Cost-reduction commenced as construction contracts were placed
EA CEO attempted to cover up the mistakes (Newspaper article)
EA CEO attempted to cover up the mistakes (Detail and download instructions)
The Jubilee River - nothing to celebrate here (Ciwem Conference - Sept 2004)
Environment Agency v Lewin Fryer & Partners [2006] EWHC 1597 (TCC) (06 July 2006)
£2.75m out-of-court settlement for sub-standard design - September 2006 (click here)
May never be able to carry design capacity (215 cumecs)
Our money gone down the drain. A fine example of responsibility without accountability!
Channel fails to contain flood water even at relatively low volumes.
Existing gauge boards submerged (unreadable) at low volumes.
Environment Agency blame anything and anyone except themselves (click here for July 2007 letter)
Cheltenham flood defences substandard - September 2007 (click here)
Water with nowhere to go causes flooding
Probability of flooding now increasing due to neglect of watercourses and flood defences
Environment Agency want flood plain to flood (click here to see Thames CFMP)
Money spent on flood defence reduces probability of flooding.
Jubilee River - Taplow Mill Leat - Technical Report prepared for RFDC (Apr 2007)(click here)
Insurance by post-coding is unfair - the critical feature is actually floor height
Insurance 'blacklisting' needs Government action NOW - Aug 2007 (click here)
Yet another £10m ivory tower for the EA - June 2008 (click here)
Changes at the Environment Agency - in culture, policy, structure and management?
Independent department dedicated to flood defence needed NOW (Aug 2007)(click here)
Changes in the law needed NOW - flood defence must be a 'DUTY' not just a 'responsibility'!
'Flood defence' must have priority over 'flood risk management'
All 'Main Rivers' and flood defences should be identified as 'CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE'
Environment Agency should be accountable to taxpayers.
Drains, watercourses and groundwater should be monitored locally (at Parish/Town Council level)
Whatever happened to the EA's Thames Catchment Flood Management Plan?
13/5/09 - Elliot Morley (ex-Minister) claimed £16,000 for mortgage that did not exist (Telegraph)
18/10/10 - Link to submission FFW 05 (to House of Commons EFRA Committee)
Read the Jubilee River story