Published Date: 15 July
2010
By Tom Palmer, Political Correspondent
GREAT swathes of Yorkshire farmland will be
left at the mercy of floods if the
Environment Agency pushes ahead with plans
to close three pumping stations to save
money.
The agency said the stations on the River
Hull are providing drainage and not flood
defence and, since it has to prioritise
spending, it plans to stop maintenance
funding in five years.
But at the Great Yorkshire Show, the
National Farmers' Union (NFU) gave a stark
warning the pumps clear the land quickly and
if crops have to stand in flood water for
any length of time they will be worthless,
hitting both farmers and the national food
supply.
The NFU said the agency's own figures
revealed floods on a similar scale to those
in 2007 would cause more than £13m of damage
to farming businesses.
It fears the value of the land could also be
severely hit and believe other pumping
stations in the region, such as on the River
Aire or the River Don, could also be closed.
The Environment Agency (EA) insisted there
were no plans at this time to close any more
stations, claiming Hull was a unique case.
NFU President Peter Kendall said there was a
growing "chorus of dismay" over the
proposals.
He said: "Flooding has had a serious impact
on farming across Northern England for
several years in succession.
"Crop losses have run into millions of
pounds and farmers are rightly concerned
about the agency's approach to productive
agricultural land, proposing policies that
also threaten to significantly increase the
flood risk for Hull due to the resulting
higher water table.
"Having seen first hand the impact of
flooding in the region, such a move would
severely damage the competitiveness of
agriculture and horticulture on the banks of
the Hull.
"We all understand the financial pressures
that Government and its agencies face in
tackling the deficit but the Environment
Agency needs to think more cleverly and work
in partnership with farmers so we can
protect some of the best and most versatile
land in Northern England."
The strategy, which sets out a 100-year
blueprint for managing the River Hull, also
proposes to withdraw maintenance funding
above Hempholme Weir where the NFU claims
the flood banks are in need of major
investment.
Beverley farmer Martin Voase said the pumps
were absolutely crucial to maintaining
agricultural production.
"The flood banks and pumps that the agency
wants to abandon protect more than 5,500
hectares of prime agricultural land."
The EA's area manager for Yorkshire, Craig
McGarvey, said its studies concluded there
would be no increased risk to Hull from
flooding.
He said the agency's role was to protect
homes and businesses from flooding, not
provide drainage for agricultural land, and
its offer to run the stations for the next
five years while alternative local funding
was sought was "a generous one".
It is estimated the stations will cost
around £120,000 a year to run, with an
estimated £1m in maintenance over 10 years.
Mr McGarvey said: "The pumps do need to
drain the land and we are not saying that
should not happen – but we have to
prioritise money and we cannot keep putting
money into this. The plans that we have put
forward are to protect more than 5,000
hectares of land.
"Clearly we are not just walking away, we
will be spending around £109m over the next
10 years on flood defences so we are not
abandoning East Yorkshire.
"The 2007 floods caused £3bn of damage, of
that £2bn was to homes and businesses and
£50m was losses to agriculture. It is a very
small percentage that was affected, although
clearly if you are the farmer it is a lot.
But is it right that the public purse pays
for this or is it better that we find a
local solution paid for by the local people
who benefit?"
- Last Updated: 14 July
2010 8:42 AM
- Source:
n/a
- Location: Yorkshire