Added 27/1/2012 You are here: Jubilee River Home Page > Jubilee River - key facts > The Jubilee River Story - 0001 > Index > How to contact me > Jubilee River guided tours
< FIRST PAGE < PREVIOUS PAGE NEXT PAGE > INDEX > ARCHIVE INDEX > NFPP
The Jubilee River story - Pitt Review - Final progress report - Jan 2012
Below is a short extract from the report.
The complete report may be obtained using link - http://archive.defra.gov.uk/environment/flooding/documents/risk/pitt-response.pdf
Sir Michael Pitt’s review of the summer 2007 floods
Following the widespread and serious flooding in England during June and July 2007, Sir
Michael Pitt conducted an independent review of the way the events were managed. Sir
Michael published the interim conclusions of the Review in December 2007: the final report -
The Pitt Review: Lessons learned from the 2007 floods - was published in June 2008.
The final report contained a detailed assessment of what happened and what we might do
differently. It put forward 92 recommendations covering prediction and warning of flooding,
prevention, emergency management, resilience and recovery. Many of the recommendations
were far-reaching and called for a radical reshaping of our flood risk management practice.
Alongside the final report, Sir Michael’s team published an implementation and delivery guide,
setting out who the team felt was responsible for ensuring implementation of each
recommendation and the suggested timescale for doing so.
Government response
A government response was published in December 2008 and the Ministers in post at the time
accepted all of the Report’s recommendations and gave an undertaking to implement them in
line with the delivery guide. Defra’s Structural Reform Plan reinforced the Coalition Agreement
commitment to ensure that the remaining Pitt recommendations were implemented.
The response set out an implementation plan for each recommendation and work on delivery
has been the responsibility of a number of Government Departments and Agencies, with Defra
providing overall coordination. A cabinet sub-committee, with a remit to improve the country’s
ability to deal with flooding and implement the recommendations of the Pitt Review, was
established by the previous Government and progress was reported to it. Having overseen the
initial implementation of the Pitt recommendations, the sub-committee has since been
disbanded.
Progress reports
Since the response was published, two progress reports have been published, in June and
December 2009. These progress reports showed what action had been taken to ensure we are
better placed to predict, prepare for, deal with and recover from the unique challenges posed by
flooding events. This report is a final assessment of progress.
Key progress and developments since the last progress report of December 2009 are
summarised below.
●
The Flood and Water Management Bill became an Act in 2010, providing for better,more comprehensive management of flood risk for people, homes and businesses, helps
safeguard community groups from unaffordable rises in surface water drainage charges
and protects water supplies to the consumer.
●
Publication, in July 2011, of the National Flood and Coastal Erosion RiskManagement Strategy
for England and statutory guidance on co-operation andrequesting information. The strategy sets out a statutory framework that will help
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
2
communities, the public sector and other organisations to work together to manage flood
and coastal erosion risk. It will support local decision-making and engagement in flood
and coastal erosion risk management, making sure that risks are managed in a coordinated
way across catchments and along each stretch of coast.
●
The National Flood Emergency Framework was published in July 2010. This providesguidance and advice for councils and others on planning for and responding to floods.
The Framework will be a ‘one stop shop’ reference point on flood planning and will be
updated on a regular basis.
●
The Water Industry (Schemes for Adoption of Private sewers) Regulations 2011transferred private sewers that connect to the public sewerage system to the water and
sewerage on 1 October 2011. This transfer will provide customers with the assurance of
having a regulated company responsible for maintaining and repairing the sewerage
system serving their property, which works to minimum standards of service, which is
overseen by Ofwat, and on whom they can call if problems arise.
●
Exercise Watermark was successfully run in March 2011. The final report waspublished in October 2011.
Some recommendations are no longer being taken forward, or not as originally envisaged by
the Review;
Recommendation 28: the forthcoming flooding legislation should be a single
unifying Act that addresses all sources of flooding, clarifies responsibilities and
facilitates flood risk management
Due to parliamentary time constraints the Flood and Water Management Act focussed on
the immediate legislative requirements. It is intended to consolidate legislation in due
course, probably once further water legislation is passed. In the meantime work is
continuing on consolidation of some aspects of legislation (e.g. reservoirs) subject to
availability of counsel’s time. Defra’s Departmental Plan makes clear our commitment to
complete this consolidation work by December 2014.
Recommendation 59; The Risk and Regulation Advisory Council should explore
how the public can improve their understanding of community risks, including
those associated with flooding, and that the Government should then implement
the findings as appropriate.
The Risk and Regulation Advisory Council published its review “Rising Levels? Public
awareness and understanding of risks from flooding” in December 2009, in which they
made 8 recommendations. All but one of these have been implemented; BIS started to
implement recommendation 6 (requesting Government support for research to further
develop the Risk and Regulation Advisory Council’s ideas on public risk and
responsibility), but the change in administration has brought this to a hold and it has not
been picked up again because of reduced resources. The seven other
recommendations have been implemented by Defra, the Environment Agency and Lead
Local Flood Authorities.
Recommendation 63; flood risk should be made part of the mandatory search
requirements when people buy properties, and form part of Home Information
Packs (HIPs).
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
3
Following the abolition of HIPs (a Coalition Agreement commitment), there is no longer a
legal requirement for an investigation of flood risks in the home buying process. However
it is likely that where a home is at risk of flooding, prospective purchasers or their
advisers will commission an environmental search which addresses flood risk, in line with
Law Society guidance to solicitors, and make an informed decision as to whether to
proceed.
Recommendation 87: The Government should establish a Cabinet Committee with
a remit to improve the country’s ability to deal with flooding and implement the
recommendations of this Review; and
Recommendation 88: The Government should establish a National Resilience
Forum to facilitate national level multi-agency planning for flooding and other
emergencies
The governance arrangements for national security and resilience have been reviewed,
including through the National Security Strategy and the Strategic Defence and Security
Review (SDSR) published on 18 and 19 October 2010 respectively; they do not include
a Committee devoted to flooding nor a National Resilience Forum.
However, the NSC sub-committee on threats, hazards, resilience and contingencies
(THRC) does cover flooding which is recognised in the National Security Strategy as a
high risk for the longer term; and there is a number of forums in which government and
other stakeholders with an interest in resilience can meet and this will include specifically
an infrastructure security and resilience advisory council, announced in the SDSR; which
will significantly enhance cooperation between public sector bodies and private sector
providers of national infrastructure (for example the water industry). Flood and coastal
erosion risk management may also be considered by the Home Affairs Committee.
The external link to full report on the Defra website -
http://archive.defra.gov.uk/environment/flooding/documents/risk/pitt-response.pdf