Added 1/12/2010 You are here: Jubilee River Home Page > Jubilee River - key facts > The Jubilee River Story > How to contact me > Jubilee River guided tours
< PREVIOUS PAGE NEXT PAGE > INDEX > ARCHIVE INDEX >
The Jubilee River story - Flood Risk and Insurance - by David Chrichton - March 2005
David Crichton is a Fellow of the Chartered Insurance Institute and a Chartered Insurance Practitioner. He has some 30 years experience in insurance underwriting, latterly as a senior manager in claims and underwriting for a major insurer, but is now an independent research consultant.
Flood Risk & Insurance in England and Wales
Executive Summary
Flood insurance in Britain is going to become harder to obtain in the future. An
agreement by insurers to provide household flood insurance at a reasonable cost
anywhere in Britain expired at the end of 2002, and already many insurers are not
offering cover for new business. The stated reasons for this agreement being
discontinued are the lack of adequate planning controls and a lack of adequate
spending on flood defences. These reasons have caused some surprise in Scotland,
where since Devolution in 1999, planning controls have been tightened up by most
local planning authorities to limit any building in the floodplain, and spending on flood
defences has risen dramatically.
The insurance industry as a whole has mainly been concentrating on lobbying central
Government to spend more money on flood defences in England and Wales, a tactic
that has only been partially successful so far. Perhaps this is because flood defence
spending has to compete with many other, arguably more deserving, calls on the public
purse.
Since 1995, the author has been concentrating on non-structural measures, such as
planning controls and sustainable drainage. He hopes to show that this non-structural
approach has been particularly successful in Scotland. Many experts around the world
now see non-structural measures as being a more sustainable, efficient way ahead,
tackling the problem rather than relieving the symptoms. For example, years of regular
face to face meetings at a local level have given the author the opportunity to influence
planning strategies for all the main population centres in Scotland. Current planning
strategies for most of these communities now presume against allowing any new
housing development where the flood risk exceeds the 200-year return period. In
addition, differences in legislation in Scotland have resulted in preparations being made
for a test case for insurers to recover up to £70m in claims payments from a local
authority in Scotland. If successful, it could have important implications for the flood
insurance risk north of the Border.
The author’s confidential discussions with the senior underwriting managers of many of
the leading insurance companies indicate that there is a very low awareness in the
British insurance industry of what has been achieved in Scotland and he hopes that this
report will help to remedy that situation. While the solutions are working well in
Scotland, it may already be too late for the South East of England, where some radical
measures may be required in the future. Some of these measures are listed in the
future outlook section at the end of this report.
Complete document: 209 pages - 1.9MB.jpg
Source document: Benfield Hazard Research Centre