23/6/2008

 

New Civil Engineer
New Civil Engineer

Full flood responsibility for Environment Agency
  • Published: 18 June 2008 17:51
  • Author: Ed Owen
The Environment Agency will be given the overview for all flooding issues - Phil Woolas

The Environment Agency will be given the overview for all flooding issues - Phil Woolas

Ministers are to put the  Environment Agency in charge of surface water flood defence  strategy in major shake up of responsibility for dealing  with flooding.
 

The move will end the current situation where responsibility for  tackling flooding is  spread between government, local authorities and other organisations.

This has led to confusion about  who is responsible for specific matters relating to rain induced floods.

"The Agency will be given the strategic overview for all flooding issues," said Woolas, speaking at the NCE's 'Future of UK Water Resources' conference.

"Local authorities will take responsibility for surface water flooding in their communities. It seems to me that they are best placed to deal with this issue," he said.

The Agency is already responsible for river and coastal floods.

Woolas' announcement pre-empts Sir Michael Pitt's 'lessons learned' review into the floods of 2007, which will be published next week. The government has also set-aside £34.5M to carry out  any work Pitt's report will propose.

Pitt had previously claimed his final report would recommend that local authorities would need dedicated flood engineers (NCE 24 January). However, the Government's proposals revealed by Woolas are designed to remove this highly costly requirement by giving local authorities pooled Agency resources.

Woolas said he hoped local authorities would not ask for more money to drive through schemes to deal with potential surface water floods, but a senior government source told NCE that this would be, "highly likely".

The proposals will form part of the draft Floods and Water Bill, to be announced in December's Queen's speech. The bill will enable the Agency to order landowners to carry out flood  prevention work. If landowners refused, Woolas said that the Agency could be given "the power under statute to carry out the work themselves, then charge the landowner for the work they've done."

University of Sheffield professor of urban drainage Richard Ashley said  the success of the shake  up will depend on "who will replace Barbara Young as chief executive of the Agency," and whether that person has technical experience.

"The Agency has to deal with its two functions – its environmental function and its function to look after people," said Ashley.

"But in principle this could work."

Woolas added that the new legislation would also change the current situation where water regulator Ofwat prevents the construction of upstream measures which would protect downstream water infrastructure.

The need to build such preventative measures was highlighted by the plight of Mythe treatment works near Tewkesbury, Gloucestershire flooded last summer, leaving 140,000 people without mains drinking water.

 
  • Author: Ed Owen.

Reader Response

Added: Monday, 23 June 2008 16:19 BST
Katja Leyendecker, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom

Who is doing the pushing and promoting?

Strategy sorted. Great. Back to grassroots though. Which body is in charge of promoting water-recycling devices (rainwater butts and grey water reuse)? Who is responsible for encouraging permeable paving to reduce overall runoff into our flooding watercourses? Engineers do know about these water savers and are usually happy to recommend these methods for new-builts. At the same time backing from an enlightened project team is currently required. For existing buildings, how can retrofitting be encouraged? Who is doing the public relations and education of this watery enterprise? I feel we may be at the start of a very long road ahead of us.
 


Alert if offensive or unsuitable

Added: Monday, 23 June 2008 09:13 BST
Brian Rodgers, High Wycombe, United Kingdom

I read the Editor's comment on the speech by Phil Woolas MP regarding responsiblity for flooding. I also read a copy of the speech. Their are significant differences between the speech and how that is reported by NCE. The most blatant is the comment in NCE that the Environment Agency are to get more enforcement powers whereas the Mister's speech clearly states Local Authorities are to be given enforcement powers.
There is also no mention in the speech about LA's having access to pooled Agency resources.
The Comment and the subsequent reports are at best inaccurate and at worst are deliberately misleading and I would have expected a matter as seriously as this to be reported accurately.