I would like to add to your poignant example of the many,
many ways, over countless years, in which the on-site, highly professional
lockkeepers have come to the rescue of river users - whether on boats or on
foot - and thereby avoided the dire consequences had they not been there on
site - whatever the hour and day:
1. Last summer's floods: if it had not been for the immediate
emergency action and ongoing monitoring of levels over several WEEKS by
Steve Long at Days, many boats - including our own - would unquestionably
have sunk. Such action is not a REQUIREMENT of lock-keepers but, given their
professionalism and accumulated experience of hundreds of years, this is
what they DID up and down the river, and have always DONE - they
are IRREPLACEABLE.
2. A few years ago, at night, we were fired on with an airgun
in Cookham Reach - with our sleeping children in the bow. For their safety,
we moved to the sanctuary of the Boulters Lock Keeper and his house. This
was at about midnight. He was most understanding and helpful, and called the
police who came swiftly, thanks to the lock-keeper's pressure and his good
professional relationship with the local constabulary. The Lock-Keepers are
part of their local communities - to the benefit of all river users. No
non-residential lock-keeper location can possibly replace this on-site
proactivity, provided by these "front-line" staff who are the REAL managers
of the river.
These specific examples should be seen to add to the daily
"added-value" that lockkeepers provide to everyone moving on or beside the
river - to give fullsome and specific advice to act safely and securely at
all times on a dangerous river.
In MOST modern, forward-thinking organisations, it is the
FRONT-LINE staff who are given maximum support and treated properly. EA's
present proposals appear to be doing the reverse.
Finally, in relation to EA's 7 May news release, it is a
distortion of the facts to claim, in their proposed lock renting list, that
Days Lockhouse is "not on the lockside". In reality, it lies between the
lock, the weir and the sanitary station - all 3 of which require onsite
supervision, if EA's duty of care for the safety, security and health of ALL
river users is to be sustained..
Graham Paterson
(added 18/5/2008)