Extract from report - House of Commons Environment, Food and
Rural Affairs Committee
Flooding
Fifth Report of Session 2007–08
(Link to report http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmenvfru/49/49.pdf)
80. Our inquiry has showed that maintenance of watercourses is one of the major
issues of
public concern. Too often, local people—who are the ones closest to the problem,
and with
most at risk—are frozen out of the decision-making process about watercourse
maintenance. Given the enormous level of interest, we believe it is
appropriate that local
people have to be involved, and consulted, in the formulation of decisions about
watercourse and river maintenance. The Agency, and local authorities, must open
up
dialogue with members of the public, through appropriate local fora, to ensure
that
they are part of this process. This would at least ensure that local people
have opportunity
to discuss their concerns with Agency, or other, staff, and that public
expectations are
managed appropriately.
81. Once decisions have been made, the Agency should make
clear, via its website or
other means, the maintenance programme for all its watercourses—even if this, in
some cases, is minimal—including the risk assessment which the Agency has made
in
deciding its approach to maintenance of a particular watercourse. The future
schedule
of maintenance should be announced whenever possible.
82. The Government should ask the Environment Agency and
Natural England to agree
on how to resolve any conflict between effective drainage for flood defence
purposes
and the preservation of watercourses as important wildlife habitats, and publish
the
results.
83. The Government should re-examine the money available
for the maintenance of
watercourses and produce a clear analysis, by the end of 2008, of the balance
between
maintenance and capital spend, bearing in mind the National Audit Office’s
conclusions, the scepticism of the public that not enough maintenance is being
done,
and the views of the Environment Agency.
New page - Prof. Knight and the EFRA Committee Report