{"id":479,"date":"2020-04-15T21:43:52","date_gmt":"2020-04-15T21:43:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/?page_id=479"},"modified":"2020-05-02T19:32:18","modified_gmt":"2020-05-02T19:32:18","slug":"report-to-flood-forum-15-4-2020","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/report-to-flood-forum-15-4-2020\/","title":{"rendered":"Reports"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>1 May 2020:\u00a0 Brief report to Datchet, Horton and Wraysbury Parish Councils.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>River Thames Scheme &#8211; RBWM funding shortfall and associated local land drainage issues<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><u>RTS Partnership Funding<\/u><\/strong><strong>. \u00a0<\/strong>RBWM recently revealed a \u00a343m unresolved RTS Partnership funding shortfall (see RBWM Press Release dated 30\/3\/2020).<\/p>\n<p>The closing statement in my <strong>previous report dated 3\/4\/2020<\/strong> was as follows:<\/p>\n<p>On 1\/4\/2020 I was involved in a 90 minute TRFCC teleconference when it became apparent that I had not been included in discussions on RTS partnership funding details.\u00a0 Worse still \u2013 despite being the appointed representative on the TRFCC \u2013 and asking repeatedly \u2013 I had been kept in the dark.\u00a0 My understanding of the current situation is that<strong> WITHOUT ADDITIONAL FUNDING \u2013 THE DATCHET, HORTON AND WRAYSBURY SECTION OF THE RIVER THAMES SCHEME <u>WILL NOT BE PROGRESSED.<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Apparently the current position is that RBWM is seeking Departmental support and\/or approval for a method of fundraising.<\/p>\n<p><strong><u>Local land drainage issues<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Environment Agency is responsible for main river issues.\u00a0 As designated Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA) RBWM is responsible for \u2018ordinary\u2019 watercourses and some other sources of flooding.\u00a0 <strong>Due to CV19 &#8211; the RBWM Flood Liaison Meeting (scheduled for 29\/4\/2020) was cancelled.<\/strong>\u00a0 The good news is that the weir failure at Wraysbury Station (reported in September 2018) was fixed in July 2019 but\u2026\u2026..<\/p>\n<p><strong><u>The bad news<\/u><\/strong><strong>: The channel blockage and fencing at Feathers Lane was reported to RBWM in April 2019. <\/strong>\u00a0One year later and recent inspection revealed that the original problems have <strong>not been fixed<\/strong> and the channel is being steadily filled with rubble.\u00a0 There is a more detailed report available (dated 15\/4\/2020).\u00a0 I have requested and am awaiting copies of enforcement notices.\u00a0 The Splash (The Green, Wraysbury) is at <strong>very low level and stagnant due to lack of upstream maintenance<\/strong>.\u00a0 Identified restrictions have <strong>not been cleared by the riparian owners<\/strong>.\u00a0 There are similar watercourse maintenance issues East of Bells Lane, Horton.\u00a0 Rather than wait until we have problems I believe<strong> RBWM needs to create and publish a procedure for the systematic inspection and maintenance of the local land drainage infrastructure.\u00a0 <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/IMG_029372616-Feathers-Lane.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-520 alignright\" src=\"http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/IMG_029372616-Feathers-Lane-1024x768.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"349\" height=\"261\" srcset=\"http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/IMG_029372616-Feathers-Lane-1024x768.jpg 1024w, http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/IMG_029372616-Feathers-Lane-300x225.jpg 300w, http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/IMG_029372616-Feathers-Lane-768x576.jpg 768w, http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/IMG_029372616-Feathers-Lane-1536x1152.jpg 1536w, http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/IMG_029372616-Feathers-Lane-830x623.jpg 830w, http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/IMG_029372616-Feathers-Lane-230x173.jpg 230w, http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/IMG_029372616-Feathers-Lane.jpg 1632w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 349px) 100vw, 349px\" \/><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Feathers-Lane65141-190412-rotated.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-521 alignnone\" src=\"http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Feathers-Lane65141-190412-768x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"205\" height=\"273\" srcset=\"http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Feathers-Lane65141-190412-768x1024.jpg 768w, http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Feathers-Lane65141-190412-225x300.jpg 225w, http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Feathers-Lane65141-190412-1152x1536.jpg 1152w, http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Feathers-Lane65141-190412-830x1107.jpg 830w, http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Feathers-Lane65141-190412-230x307.jpg 230w, http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Feathers-Lane65141-190412-rotated.jpg 1512w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 205px) 100vw, 205px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>April <strong>2019 <\/strong>\u2013 Feathers Lane\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 April<strong> 2020<\/strong> \u2013 Feathers Lane<\/p>\n<p><strong><u>National land drainage issues.<\/u><\/strong><strong>\u00a0\u00a0 <\/strong>I have revealed the lack of local infrastructure maintenance and ineffective LLFA to the National Flood Forum.\u00a0 Apparently we are not alone.\u00a0 The NFF is currently considering what is a huge and contentious topic and some of the elements of concern are listed below:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Who is responsible for what?<\/li>\n<li>What do maintenance obligations mean, in reality?<\/li>\n<li>How can management be enforced?<\/li>\n<li>What happens when an organisation states that it is no longer responsible for maintenance, if anything?<\/li>\n<li>How does the law apply in urban areas where culverts, or other assets, collapse and what often happens in reality?<\/li>\n<li>Are there any voluntary approaches and do they work?<\/li>\n<li>Given that this area is governed largely by case law rather than statute, what needs to change and what can we do to bring it about?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>In conclusion<\/strong> &#8211; I will continue to push for RTS Channel 1 to be both properly funded and to remain within the RTS project.\u00a0 As for local watercourses &#8211; my objective is to ensure that the LLFA (as the flood risk management authority) fulfils their duties under the Flood and Water Management Act 2010.<\/p>\n<p>You will find an informative Surrey CC maintenance document here: <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.surreycc.gov.uk\/__data\/assets\/pdf_file\/0018\/104184\/Good-Practice-for-Watercourse-Maintenance-.pdf\">https:\/\/www.surreycc.gov.uk\/__data\/assets\/pdf_file\/0018\/104184\/Good-Practice-for-Watercourse-Maintenance-.pdf<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>END<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Report to Paul Cobbing &#8211; National Flood Forum<\/p>\n<p>From Ewan Larcombe <a href=\"mailto:ewan@jubileeriver.co.uk\">ewan@jubileeriver.co.uk<\/a><\/p>\n<p>15\/4\/2020<\/p>\n<p><strong><u>LLFA neglect of ordinary watercourse maintenance \u2013 Wraysbury, Berkshire<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The location and route of the Wraysbury Drain is marked in red on the map below.<\/p>\n<p>INSERT MAP HERE<\/p>\n<p><strong>Background<\/strong>: The Wraysbury Drain is over two miles of very ancient and legally protected watercourse that is an important part of the local network of land drainage infrastructure within a very level landscape. \u00a0Starting near Wraysbury Railway Station the channel takes a steadily curving route downstream running generally parallel to Station Road, the High Street and Staines Road and finishing in Hythe End. The channel is designated \u2018ordinary watercourse\u2019 but has dimensional cross-sections specified by Enclosure Act legislation over 200 years ago.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Changes<\/strong> \u2013 starting in the 1980\u2019s -the area between Douglas Lane, Station Road and the railway line was quarried for gravel and the channels entirely removed. After ignoring warnings the railway bridge collapsed in 1988. \u00a0Upon completion of partial backfilling the local drainage channels were reinstated on different routes. It became necessary to install a weir in order to \u2018drive\u2019 (i.e. provide sufficient head of water) the now relocated Wraysbury Drain. The original stoplog weir was then replaced with an adjustable metal weir in about 2006. There are images of the two weirs available.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>The current situation: <\/strong>Despite expenditure of at least \u00a3125,000 and the recent best efforts of local volunteers the Wraysbury Drain is still not flowing properly.<strong>\u00a0 <\/strong>The failed weir at Wraysbury Station was identified as a major problem and reported in September 2018. \u00a0After a long list of reasons why maintenance works could not be started the weir was eventually repaired in mid-July 2019. The channel flowed well until January 2020 but is now about to go dry again.<\/p>\n<p>The upstream channel is blocked by fallen trees.\u00a0 There is also gravel at both sides of and beneath the bridge at the entrance to the Dive Centre in Station Road. The gravel needs to be cleared. \u00a0The Diving Centre Bridge design\/construction shortcoming allows vehicles to displace the gravel into the channel. The bridge needs fixing otherwise the problem will continue.<\/p>\n<p>From the Dive Centre Bridge upstream to the junction near the weir \u2013 flow is restricted by thirty years of tree growth and fallen trees. This new section of channel was created along a different route after the Wraysbury Station Railway Bridge collapse in 1988. This length of the Wraysbury Drain has not been maintained for 30 years.\u00a0 Apart from the cost there are issues relating to access and\/or responsibility!<\/p>\n<p>At Feather\u2019s Lane the channel is now entirely blocked, having been filled to ground level with rubble and fenced over and the channel has also been culverted without permission.<\/p>\n<p><strong>In my opinion the issues remain unresolved due to RBWM reluctance to take enforcement action against obstructive and inconsiderate landowners.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/IMG_024872192-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"Image 3\" \/> Trees at Station Road<\/p>\n<p>END<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>1 May 2020:\u00a0 Brief report to Datchet, Horton and Wraysbury Parish Councils. River Thames Scheme &#8211; RBWM funding shortfall and associated local land drainage issues RTS Partnership Funding. \u00a0RBWM recently revealed a \u00a343m unresolved RTS Partnership funding shortfall (see RBWM Press Release dated 30\/3\/2020). The closing statement in my previous report dated 3\/4\/2020 was as &#8230;.&nbsp;&nbsp;<a class=\" default\" href=\"http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/report-to-flood-forum-15-4-2020\/\">Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/479"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=479"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/479\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":523,"href":"http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/479\/revisions\/523"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/flooding.london\/rts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=479"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}