Published Date: 01 July
2010
By ANNA SMITH
FEARS that Morpeth residents will have to
fork out for flood defences have been
dismissed.
The Environment Agency is planning a
£17million alleviation scheme to give
greater protection to the town following the
flooding disaster of September 2008.
But residents were alarmed earlier this week
when Agency Chief Executive Dr Paul Leinster
said communities and businesses would have
to contribute to investment in programmes.
However, Morpeth Project Manager Phil Welton
said the organisation has no intention of
seeking public contributions for the
proposed scheme and the business case for
national funding is progressing well.
"I want to make it very clear that we are
not going to be asking the residents of
Morpeth for money. We don't want to worry
people unnecessarily," he said.
"There may be opportunities for potential
contributions from big businesses who want
to enhance the scheme and we do want to look
at other sources of funding, but that is not
going down to the level of asking the people
of Morpeth to use their own money.
"The scheme is progressing really well at
the moment. We are preparing the business
case and that will be scrutinised like all
schemes nationally, but we are still aiming
to start work on site next year."
Speaking at a Flood and Coastal Risk
Management conference in Telford, Dr
Leinster said spending on flood projects is
at record levels, with £629m set aside this
year, and that while continued Government
investment is important, there is a need to
find other sources of funding and increased
contributions from those who will benefit
from work.
Examples included a supermarket development
in Hereford, where the operator contributed
£2m to a flood project as part of planning
conditions, a community in East Hanney,
which built its own minor scheme, and an
area in Bardsey where landowners and
residents set up a trust to raise
£2.2million for a project that did not score
highly enough as a priority for funding.
Mr Welton said: "The Chief Executive made a
statement about needing to find alternative
ways of funding schemes and he is absolutely
right because we are in difficult times.
"Going forward it is going to be more
difficult so we need to look at
alternatives.
"We would be looking towards big businesses
in flood plains, which really should
contribute towards flood defences if they
are being protected.
"We are not talking about individual
residents in Morpeth having to fund their
own protection.
"In some areas of the country local people
have raised funds, but that is really where
schemes are well down the priority list and
Morpeth is not that sort of case.
"We have a strong case for a flood
alleviation scheme in Morpeth and it meets
the national criteria."
However, residents are being encouraged to
install their own flood protection measures
in individual properties, such as airbrick
covers and floodboards for doors and
windows.
The Agency has recently added an extra
resource for people wishing to keep a close
watch on river levels with on-line data from
monitoring stations.
The information will be updated daily, or
more frequently during flooding incidents,
to help people decide when to put their
flood plans into action.
Data is available for rivers and coastal
areas around the country, including from
stations in Mitford, Hartburn, Nunnykirk,
Middleton Bridge, Stamfordham and Ponteland.
Head of Flood Incident Management Craig
Woolhouse said: "Our new service is there to
help people, communities and businesses make
informed decisions about how to respond to
potential flooding.
"It will also be a valuable source of
up-to-date information for boaters, surfers
and other water users."
Work is ongoing to finalise the business
case for the Morpeth flood alleviation
scheme.
The Environment Agency has appointed Birse
as its contractor to construct the scheme,
consisting of town centre defences and an
upstream floodwater storage reservoir, if
funding is approved.
Work will also be carried out to burns to
ensure defences are up to the same standard
of protection as the main project.
Officials are hopeful that time can be
shaved off the expected construction period
of the project to bring forward its
completion date, due in late 2013.