Added 6/10/2009


Warning of extra tax for flood defences
Published Date: 05 October 2009
By Jonathan Reed and Simon Bristow
FLOOD-threatened communities have been warned they face council tax
surcharges and businesses may be forced to pay extra if they want more flood
defences.
Despite increasing spending on flood prevention, the Government still cannot
afford all the projects necessary to protect homes and businesses, a
Minister has admitted.
Environment Minister Huw Irranca-Davies said communities should be prepared
to consider ideas such as a council tax surcharge – if there is local
support – to pay for schemes which are not considered enough of a priority
to win central funding.
Businesses could also be asked to stump up the cash as more "imaginative"
ways of improving flood defences are thought up in a bid to prevent a repeat
of the 2007 floods, when thousands of homes across Yorkshire and
Gloucestershire were damaged.
Two years later, some homeowners are still only now returning to their
properties.
The suggestions were dismissed by one Yorkshire Labour MP, who warned having
different councils acting differently would risk simply transferring
problems from one area to the next.
An East Riding Tory MP, however, said it was time to stop paying lip service
to the needs of local communities and called for a clear policy to assist
landowners, councils and community groups who wanted to protect their land
and property.
Mr Irranca-Davies floated the ideas at a fringe meeting at Labour's spring
conference, pointing to a referendum held in the South West by a local
authority seeking to raise extra funds for projects. "These are the sort of
ideas we need to think about," he said.
He added: "I think we ought to think seriously if we have doubled the
spending, as we have, in flood prevention measures and we're saying that
isn't enough.
"We have to get pretty serious about how we lever in additionality to
enhance what we can do. Are we willing to grasp that opportunity of local
collaboration and local ownership as well as the input of the Environment
Agency and others?
"In the long-term how do we reconcile that there's never going to be enough
simply for central government or local government to help. Is there an
argument – I think there is – to say other actors playing a part in this?"
But Rother Valley MP Kevin Barron, whose constituency has been badly hit by
flooding, said increasing taxes in one area but not the neighbouring one
would not tackle the problems.
"I can't see how we're going to progress any comprehensive system of getting
over the problems we've got in South Yorkshire on the basis of one local
authority feeling they're prepared to risk an increase in local taxes for
some form of flood prevention when the one next door doesn't," he said.
"It'll just tip water from one place to another."
Beverley and Holderness MP Graham Stuart, whose constituents were among the
worst hit in 2007, said: "I want to see properly funded flood protection at
national level, but if local communities do have to contribute then we need
a clear process by which that would work and that's what we haven't got.
"No guidance has been produced by the Government and two years after the
2007 floods it's not good enough."
Coun Carl Minns, leader of the city council in Hull – which was the worst
hit local authority in the country, with 8,000 homes and hundreds of
businesses affected – said it was "unacceptable" to expect people to pay
more than they already did in taxes for flood defences.